THE HON ALANNAH MACTIERNAN MP
SHADOW PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA
SHADOW PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE
MEMBER FOR PERTH
IRRESPONSIBLE FREIGHT LINK T
HREATENS WA’S GROWTH
The $1.76 billion Perth Freight Link lobbed like a UFO onto the Abbott Government’s first Budget in May 2014.
The sorry genesis of this project tells us a lot about the absurdly partisan way the Abbott Government does business.
At the beginning of 2014 the Federal
Government had a problem. It was about to take $500 million out of the
Budget promised to Perth rail project, because Tony Abbott had declared
he would never fund urban rail.
The Abbott Government knew it had to fill
that hole to stop an uprising in WA, a state already suffering from a
plummeting GST share.
So Assistant Infrastructure Minister
Jamie Briggs and Finance Minister Mathias Cormann flew across the
Nullarbor in February to sit down with our Transport Minister Dean
Nalder.
Mr Nalder went in to pitch for funds for
an outer harbour at Kwinana – a plan developed over 20 years by
successive governments, both Liberal and Labor, to keep WA’s economy
growing once Fremantle port reached its capacity around 2022.
Even the Barnett Government had continued
this planning – its 2008 ‘Vision for the Port of Fremantle’ committed
the Liberal Party to progressing the outer harbour, and right up until
mid-2014, WA Government agencies were still assessing the project.
But 45 minutes into the meeting, Mr
Nalder walked out with a cobbled together mix of the Roe Highway Stage 8
extension and upgrades to Fremantle roads in his hand – rebranded as
the Perth Freight Link.
In fact, Freedom of Information searches
have shown us that the first contact between Commonwealth and State
agencies to provide advice on the cost-benefit and design of the project
occurred in mid-March 2014, just two months before it was announced.
There was no careful planning and no Infrastructure Australia assessment
prior to the announcement.
The problems with this project have been
well documented; the destruction of wetlands, the threat to homes and
businesses, the ludicrous fact that it stops 1.5km short of the port,
forcing a bottleneck at Stirling Bridge. Dealing with the latter two
problems will add at least $700 million to the project.
But the real threat to WA’s future is
throwing billions of dollars at a short-term solution that does not
address the need for a new port in less than 10 years.
That’s why infrastructure projects need
extensive and transparent planning: to ensure the dollars are being
spent in the most effective places.
In 2002 the WA Labor Government undertook
an exhaustive freight network review to work out how best to deal with
WA’s growing freight needs.
We knew back then that smashing a highway
through suburban Fremantle to reach a port that was nearing capacity
wasn’t the answer – that’s why we removed the Fremantle Eastern Bypass
from Perth’s planning schemes.
So we developed a six-point plan for
freight. Part of that did involve road upgrades through Fremantle – but
critically, it involved planning on the outer harbour as a matter of
urgency.
So much so that Labor committed to building the outer harbour in 2005.
The Perth Freight Link is an
irresponsible, ill-planned project that will worsen the congestion
problems around Fremantle and threaten WA’s future freight trade growth
by leaving us short of critical port capacity.
If the Barnett and Abbott Governments are
serious about future proofing WA’s industries they should get on with
planning and developing the outer harbour, and avoid wasting scarce
taxpayer money on outdated roads to a constrained port.
This article was first published in The Sunday Times on Sunday, 30 August 2015.